In the Center for Applied Dialectics Labs and Studio with Daniel Görtz we have not yet adequately address the thesis:
Hanzi’s political agenda could be enhanced if we also consider Michael Basseches cognitive developmental research based upon a dialectical critical realist meta-theory (as opposed to Michael Commons's MHC and/or Ken Wilber's Integral).
Further Provocation
‣
To what extent can the process architecture of metamodern politics be complete without incorporating some degree of dialectical thinking?
‣
How do assessment approaches based on open ended versus closed staged models differ in terms of their validity and reliability?
‣
Given that Hanzi’s metamodernism is so dependent on the reliability of Michael Common’s developmental stage model, how is the validity of Hanzi depreciated based upon the limitations of Common’s models?